Homepage
CIL Dialogues
Symposia
Remembering Peace in a Time of War: Why International Law Matters More Than Ever
Building Peace

Remembering Peace in a Time of War:
Why International Law Matters More Than Ever

Building Peace

Women’s participation in peace processes through instruments like CEDAW and UNSC Resolution 1325 suffer from weak enforcement, and elite-driven negotiations which limit impact. Stronger legal obligations and accountability would ensure meaningful inclusion.

What Role for International Law in Ensuring Women’s Participation in Peace Processes and Beyond? by Julia Vassileva

International law recognizes non-State armed groups in peace deals, but lasting peace needs wider inclusion of diverse non-State actors. Engaging broader communities boosts legitimacy and public support, making peace processes more durable and effective.

The Architects of Peace: Studying the Involvement of Non-State Actors in Peace Processes by Trisha Unnikrishnan

Provisional measures requests at the ICJ can stabilize conflicts by preserving rights and diplomacy, but risk politicising disputes, legal uncertainty, and overburdening the Court. Clearer rules and coordination could enhance their peacebuilding role.

Multiple Provisional Measures Requests before the ICJ: A Facilitator or Obstacle for Peace Processes? by Onur Uraz

This post proposes that Article 39 of the UN Charter should be re-read along with Article 24(1) in the language of peace for the UNSC to carry out its ‘primary’ responsibility for maintaining international peace and security effectively.

Re-reading Article 39 of the UN Charter in the Language of Peace by Hla Yadanar Win

Manufacturing Peace

Brokering Peace