Researchers' Activities

Filter
Reset

Posts per page: 102550100
Results 21 to 30 of 133
ASEAN Law and Policy
Chan Sze-Wei attended the 38th ASEAN Roundtable

The event opened with a Keynote by ASEAN Secretary-General Dr Kao Kim Hourn, followed by panels on “Forces of Fragmentation”, ASEAN economic integration, regional flashpoints and “ASEAN in the age of multipolarity”.

ASEAN Law and Policy
CIL Researchers at the Asian Society of International Law, 9th Biennial Conference in Indonesia

TRILA Team co-organised the Junior Scholar Workshop at the University of Indonesia, Faculty of Law.

ASEAN Law and Policy
Railla Puno at the Gonzaga University School of Law 2023 Human Rights Conference: Human Rights and Climate Change

Railla Puno delivered a presentation based on working paper “Rights-based Approaches for Carbon Dioxide Removal: Asia in Focus” at the 7th edition of the Gonzaga in Florence Human Rights Conference with this year’s theme of Climate Change and Human Rights. The Conference was held in Florence, Italy from 24-25 May 2023 and was hosted by the University of Gonzaga School of Law.

ASEAN Law and Policy
Tan Hsien-Li presented at the 2022 Sokol Colloquium on Comparative Human Rights Law

Shen presented her draft chapter on “The Human Rights System of Southeast Asia” for the Oxford Handbook on Comparative Human Rights Law.

ASEAN Law and Policy
Co-Head (ASEAN Law and Policy) Dr Tan Hsien-Li gives opening lecture of the Conference on the Rule of Law: Issues and Perspectives

Dr Tan Hsien-Li gave the opening lecture of the Conference on the Rule of Law: Issues and Perspectives organised by the Raoul Wallenberg Institute in Cambodia on 10 March 2022.

ASEAN Law and Policy
26-28 March 2021 Research Associate Chan Sze-Wei judged Malaysia Model ASEAN Meeting

Research Associate Chan Sze-Wei judged the inaugural Malaysia Model ASEAN Meeting (MYMAM).

ASEAN Law and Policy
10 December 2020: ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights – Indonesia hosts discussion on book ‘Can ASEAN Take Human Rights Seriously’

On Human Rights Day, Thursday 10 December 2020, Dr Tan Hsien-Li and Professor Alison Duxbury (University of Melbourne) discussed their co-authored book ‘Can ASEAN Take Human Rights Seriously’.

ASEAN Law and Policy
25 November 2020: Co-Director for ASEAN Law and Policy Programme Dr Tan Hsien-Li spoke at ALES Symposium on Legislations on Infectious Diseases and cooperative measures of Asia countries in the post COVID-19 era

Dr Tan Hsien-Li spoke at the “Asian Legislative Experts Symposium (ALES) – Legislations on Infectious Diseases and cooperative measures of Asia countries in the post COVID-19 era”.

ASEAN Law and Policy
21–23 October 2020: CIL ASEAN Law and Policy Researchers Attend 35th ASEAN Roundtable

Co-Director (Teaching) ASEAN Law and Policy Dr Tan Hsien-Li, Research Associate Chan Sze-Wei and Research Assistant Yvette Foo attended the 35th ASEAN Roundtable ‘The COVID-19 Crisis: Impact on ASEAN and the Way Forward, an online event organised by the Yusof-Ishak Institute for Southeast Asian Studies ASEAN Studies Centre. The programme included sessions on ASEAN’s management of the pandemic and health emergencies in general, and the economic and geopolitical impact on ASEAN.

ASEAN Law and Policy
20 June 2020: Assistant Professor Tan Hsien-Li Speaks at International Conference Organised by Renmin University’s Human Rights Center

Assistant Professor Tan Hsien-Li spoke at an international conference organised by Renmin University’s Human Rights Center on ‘Human Rights Protection under Law-based Pandemic Prevention and Control: The Role of Proportionality Principles’ on 20 June.

Assistant Professor Tan spoke on ‘From SARs to COVID-19: Reflections on ASEAN’s Collective Response to Public Health Crises’. Given that proportionality is a firm legal principle that has substantively different meanings in public law and public international law, and that the COVID-19 pandemic is still propelling different facets of governance, political, public health and legal strategies of containment, she discussed whether proportionality was a good tool with which to examine the ongoing phenomenon. Apart from the fact that proportionality has been rejected as a tool of judicial reasoning by some jurisdictions, socio-cultural contexts on law, politics and governance also differ widely on how proportionality might (or might not) be used.